UX Research

Empathy Maps Externalize User Knowledge for Team Decisions

Nielsen Norman Group defines empathy maps as collaborative visualizations that externalize user knowledge, exposing gaps in research data across Agile teams.

  • AuthorJames Calloway
  • ChannelUX Research
  • Filed
  • Read2 min
Empathy Mapping: The First Step in Design Thinking
Empathy Mapping: The First Step in Design ThinkingAI-generated
  • An empathy map is a collaborative visualization capturing what a team knows about a user or user segment.
  • Maps can be built from any qualitative research method, or sketched without research if teams distinguish evidence from assumptions.
  • Empathy maps surface gaps in existing user data, showing teams where more research is needed.

An empathy map is a collaborative visualization that captures what a team knows about a particular user or user segment, according to Nielsen Norman Group's foundational article on the practice, positioned as the first step in design thinking.

The tool works by externalizing knowledge about users. Instead of leaving user understanding scattered across individual team members' heads, an empathy map puts attitudes and behaviors onto a shared artifact, creating common ground for decision making.

UX professionals advocate on users' behalf, the article notes. To do that effectively, they need to do three things: deeply understand users, communicate that understanding clearly to colleagues, and help prioritize users' needs. Empathy maps, widely used across Agile and design teams, serve both communication and prioritization goals in a single, durable format.

How the method works

Empathy mapping can draw on any qualitative research method. Teams can build maps from interview findings, field studies, or diary data — the method itself does not prescribe a research protocol.

The definition carries an important caveat: a map can be sketched even if research is lacking, provided the team is honest and clearly distinguishes evidence from assumptions. This is what makes the tool accessible to teams without dedicated research budgets, and also what makes it risky when used carelessly.

That dual character points to the map's second function. Beyond consolidating what a team knows, empathy maps reveal what it does not. They expose gaps in existing user data and show UX professionals where they need to gather more information before making design decisions.

Why teams keep using it

The persistence of empathy mapping across Agile and design teams — rather than its replacement by newer formats — suggests the underlying need it fills remains constant: teams building shared products need a shared model of the person using them.

As qualitative research methods continue to spread across product organizations, empathy mapping offers a low-cost entry point: any team that can hold a workshop and a whiteboard can start, then refine the map as real research data arrives.

Source: Nielsen Norman Group

Share this article:

More from James Calloway

James Calloway

Show full bio

Senior reporter covering regulation, policy and their impact on Product and interaction design, design systems at Interface Wire.

63 articles

Related articles

  1. NN/g: AI Cannot Generate the Evidence an Empathy Map Needs

  2. Salesforce Recasts UX Researchers as Architects of Human-AI Collaboration

  3. Mapping Meets WCAG 2.1: Minnesota Releases Accessibility Field Notes

  4. Rebuilding a Site Map Took Weeks to Design, Nearly a Year to Ship

« Previous articleNext article »